13. April 2018
The London-based directory „The Legal 500“ ranked Matthias Städeli, Christian Hilti, Louis Lagler, Alfred Köpf and Dany Vogel as leading IP practitioners. It is highly remarkable that Louis Lagler, Alfred Köpf und Dany Vogel are the only patent attorneys in Switzerland being included in this renowned ranking.
23. March 2018
Die in London erscheinende Fachzeitschrift Managing Intellectual Property (MIP) hat unsere Kanzlei als “Firm of the Year 2018” im Bereich der Patentprozesse geehrt. Zu den Highlights zählte im Jahr 2017 ein Erfolg vor Bundesgericht: Im Oktober 2017 konnte das Patent-Team von RENTSCH PARTNER eine wegweisende Entscheidung im Zusammenhang mit der Äquivalenzlehre für Pharmazeutika-Patente erstreiten.
30. January 2018
06. October 2017
Christian Hilti, Dany Vogel and Alfred Köpf have been re-elected by the United Federal Assembly on 29 September 2017 as non-permanent judges at the Federal Patent Court. The three Judges are covering different special expertise in the field of patent litigation: computer technology and software patents, including cryptography and blockchain (Dany Vogel), biology, bio-chemistry, biotechnology and organic chemistry (Alfred Köpf) and legal aspects (Christian Hilti). The second election term lasts from 2018 to 2023.
31. August 2017
We are relocating to attractive surroundings in the direct vicinity of the offices of our cooperation partner FRORIEP. On 25 September 2017 we will open our doors at
Postal address: P.O. Box, 8034 Zurich, Switzerland
All email addresses, telephone and fax numbers remain the same.
Due to technical reasons telephone calls, fax and emails will not be received between 21 September 2017- 4pm and 22 September 2017 - 10am local time. During this period of time messages will be returned to sender without being saved or read.
16. May 2017
RENTSCH PARTNER is listed in the newest BILANZ / Le Temps ranking of the leading Swiss law firms. According to the peer survey of more than 6500 attorneys, 400 in-house lawyers and General Counsels of the 500 largest companies in Switzerland, RENTSCH PARTNER is ranked among the top four law firms in Intellectual Property law. After three large law firms with full practice, RENTSCH PARTNER is ranked as Switzerland’s leading IP-Boutique.
19. April 2017
The international Magazine „Managing Intellectual Property” (www.managingip.com) was founded in 1990 and is researching and ranking IP firms since 1996. Rentsch Partner is the only Swiss IP firm that is represented by four leading practitioners: Christian Hilti (patent litigation), Louis Lagler (mechanical matters), Alfred Köpf (chemistry and biotechnology) und Dany Vogel (software patents). This strong representation in the ranking shows that Rentsch Partner has an expertise in patent matters that is unique on the Swiss market.
11. April 2017
18. January 2017
Dr. Alfred Köpf is again included as sole Swiss Patent Attorney in the 2017 edition of renowned magazine “Who is Who-Legal”. This inclusion is based on recommendations from domestic and foreign lawyers litigating in patent matters, in particular in the field of chemistry and biotechnology. The 2017 edition of “Who is Who-Legal” includes 793 corporate lawyers for Switzerland acting for 250 Swiss law firms. Rentsch Partner is represented with three attorneys (Christian Hilti, Alfred Köpf und Gregor Wild).
02. December 2016
The union trademark remains one of the main achievements of the EU Trade Mark system. The success is mainly based on the fact that the Union trade mark allows to obtain an exclusive right in all member states at a reasonable costs by filing one application resp. registration at the Union trademark at the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO).
The (trademark) consequences of a possible withdrawal of a Member State from the Union aren`t regulated by law. Neither does the Regulation (EC) No 2015/2424 (Union Trade Mark regulation) provide any clause concerning property rights in the event that a Member State may withdraw from the Union nor is the Union Trade Mark regulation applicable to the states outside the EU.
Furthermore, in the event of a withdrawal of a Member State, the EU has no exclusive regulatory competence.
Once a Member State decides to withdraw, the Lisbon Treaty requires to notify the European Council of the intention to withdraw. Upon notice, there will be a two years` term, jointly extendable, to negotiate a Withdrawal Agreement, containing a framework for the future relationship between the withdrawing state and the EU. Until the end of this term or an unanimous term resp. an absent agreement, all Union Treaties, rights and obligations would cease to apply in withdrawing state (Art. 50  TEU).
On 23 June 2016 the UK voted to leave the EU, and thereby decided for what has become known as Brexit. As of today, it is still uncertain what the exact implications of this decision are. Importantly, the Brexit vote does not lead to any immediate legal consequences for existing IP rights, nor for the grant of new IP rights after 23 June 2016.
As of today, there are various scenarios conceivable concerning the consequences for Union trademarks once the UK notified the European Council of their intention to withdraw:
There is a chance that pre-existing Union trademarks can be converted within a reasonable deadline into national UK trademarks, so that that the complete protection remain unchanged but based on the national UK trademark. The EUIPO is already acquainted with the conversion of a national trademark into a Union trademark.
Likewise, Union trademarks continue to apply in the UK even after the Brexit but will be treated as national trade marks.
There is also the option of a re-filing of core trademarks in the UK as an International Registration (Madrider system).
It is also possible that after the Brexit, Union trademarks will remain unaffected. This scenario is highly unlikely considering that this is not compatible with the basic idea of the concept of the European Union.
It is difficult to assess the full impact that Brexit will have on the protection of Union trademarks rights in the UK. It remains to be seen what consequences will arise after the UK exit. To avoid a potential protection gap and for the purpose of monitoring conflicting trademarks, the UK should, already now be treated as any other European country outside the Union.
Cooley ALERT, Brexit and the European Trade Mark System, 24. Juni 2016,
Julius STOBBS/Lucy CUNDLIFFE, Brexit, Where next for EU trademarks?, World Trademark Review, 63/2016, 80
Anna CARBONI/Michael HAWINKS et al., How the Brexit Vote Will Affect Brand Owners: A Q&A Guide, (besucht am 14. 11.2016)